Thursday, March 18, 2010
Social Media Traffic : Insight through stats
Marketer's Dilemma : Paid Search or Social Media
The recent news of Facebook beating Google to become the most visited site in US raises new questions for internet marketing, the most prominent one being - where to invest the next marketing dollars : paid search(and organic search) or social media(particularly facebook) ?The rise of Social Media has been consistently fast-paced ever since 2006. But even today, for most of the firms, majority of internet marketing budget is spent over Search(SEO+SEM), followed by PPC and affiliate marketing. Social Media marketing gets a very small chunk of the budget, and the investment is mostly considered experimental. However, this landscape is rapidly changing, and an increasing number of firms are investing considerably in Social Media, which is also evident from the increasing number of social media marketing firms opening every month.
A few key differences between these two marketing media are listed below. In case you feel any major difference has been left out, do mention it as a comment.
Paid Search | Social Media | |
Art vs. Science | An almost perfect science | A mix of both – creativity is important |
Targeting | Usually nothing, at best location-based | Much better targeting, based on personal interests, social groups, age, etc. |
Order of Events | Customers come to your site looking for something, and then you provide them a good experience | You provide customers a good experience(through social media interaction), and if they like it, they come to your site |
Quality of Traffic | Poor. Conversion rate usually low. | Higher than Paid Search(and lower than Direct Traffic) |
Click-fraud protection | Robust | Yet to see some good examples here |
Tracking consumer activity | Limited information | Lot of information |
Success Metrics | Well defined | Not so well defined |
Additional capabilities | CRM, Market Research |
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Social Media Marketing Jungle : Embracing the wilderness

- Increasing brand awareness
- Increasing relevant visitor traffic
- Increasing conversion of visitors into consumers(pushing down the conversion funnel)
- Managing reputation
Facebook beats Google, becomes most visited site : really ?
Facebook, riding a terrific wave of growth in its popularity, achieved yet another milestone last week - it toppled Google.com to become the most visited US site as mentioned in the weekly report from Hitwise, an online traffic monitor. Facebook.com had outpaced Google.com in the past as well, but it was only on major festive occasions such as Christmas and New Year. This is for the first time that Facebook has surpassed Google in weekly site visits. The market share of visits to Facebook.com increased 185% last week as compared to the same week in 2009, while visits to Google.com increased 9% during the same time frame. The tremendous growth pace of Facebook can be seen in the graph below.
At this point of time, however, these results need to be perceived with caution due to a couple of reasons :
- Other online traffic monitors such as Alexa, Compete and Quantcast continue to report Google.com as the site receiving the highest number of hits from US.
- The traffic monitoring mechanism of Hitwise is not publicly known, and nor do we know the critically important factor : sample size.
- Since Facebook, due to its inherent nature, is way more sticky than Google.com, a better measure for comparing them would be "number of unique visitors", rather than just "site visits". Also, an increasing number of internet users are doing Google search through either toolbar or other Google services such as GMail, Calendar, Reader, etc. Thus, just the "number of site visits" for Google.com does not effectively capture the popularity of Google search.
- Another big reason for this huge up-surge in the "site visits" to Facebook could be the "share on Facebook" widget which is being increasingly integrated with all the major websites worldwide. Though the action of sharing a link on Facebook requires calling facebook.com(for login), does it really qualifies as Facebook traffic ?
Hence, while there is no doubt that facebook's popularity has been sky-rocketing, and "average time spent per visit" on it is considerably greater compared to Google.com; it is highly probable that Facebook traffic comprises of repeated visits by a smaller sub-set compared to Google.com's traffic composition : less repeated site-visits by a much larger set of users. So, before arriving at any conclusions, we need to ask : are using the right metrics to compare the popularity of these two internet leaders ?